An analysis of whether we should fight a war against iraq

His firm, the Rendon Group, was recently brought back by Rumsfeld to run the Office of Strategic Influence, which places stories - some of them fabrications - in the media.

Those who will confirm that such evidence exists say it cannot be released because it contains sensitive intelligence information. Most seriously of all, the critics contend that the INC goes on producing a series of defectors schooled to tell the Americans exactly what they want to hear about the threat from Iraq, with the aim of persuading America to launch a massive military attack.

As the bishops make clear, there are no easy answers to these and other questions. Its leader, Ahmed Chalabi, they will tell you, is a man of integrity, bravery and foresight, the natural leader of a post-Saddam Iraq. One would have to consider the nature of the breach e.

An Ethical Analysis of War Against Iraq

A second strand of evidence presented by the US to support the contention that Iraq is reconstituting its offensive capability was contained in a presentation to the permanent members of the UN Security Council two weeks ago.

Finally, these efforts of enforcement, containment and deterrence against Iraq must be part of a much more serious global effort to strengthen the non-proliferation regime based on the principle of mutual restraint.

There is sometimes a tendency among those who are opposed to the war on terrorism or war in Iraq to feel a need to minimize the threat and to lose sight of a fundamental moral obligation to act with resolve to defend innocent life and the common good.

The use of force must have "serious prospects for success" and "must not produce evils and disorders graver than the evil to be eliminated" Catechism, In their November statement, the bishops "recognize that not taking military action could have its own negative consequences.

In May, Saddam will be given a deadline for readmitting the inspectors that his enemies hope he cannot meet. The Iraqi leadership must cease its internal repression, end its threats to its neighbors, stop any support for terrorism, abandon its efforts to develop weapons of mass destruction, and destroy all such existing weapons.

Should we go to war against Saddam?

It is held up as a poster child for three potentially interconnected moral challenges posed by contemporary international relations — rogue regimes, global terrorism, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.

Third, the success of any effort to rebuild Iraq after a conflict and the success of the wider war on terrorism will require the support of Arab states, our allies and others in the international community.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has developed a widely-discussed proposal for coercive inspections — i. The Hard Case Iraq is a hard case.

What troubles his former supporters - now his fiercest critics - is not the valuable information he was able to give. Do we wait for Saddam and hope for the best? The United States, in collaboration with others, has not only a moral right but a grave obligation to defend against mass terrorism and the threat Iraq poses.

Their argument is simple: What is the casus belli for a military attack on Iraq? Most were completely baseless. Jean Bethke Elshtain, who believes preemptive use of force is justified in this case, argues that "an imminent threat does not necessarily mean one that is just around the corner.

As religious leaders, the bishops offer a moral framework that can contribute to the formation of a community of conscience and can inform the momentous decisions being taken about possible war against Iraq.

He described walls lined with epoxy resin for easy decontamination, lead-lined rooms and concrete mixed with chemicals to guard against radiation. This was provided in the mid-Nineties after another high-level defector disclosed the scope of the Iraqi programme.

While the administration has not made it the principal case for going to war with Iraq, it has tried to connect the Iraqi regime to al Qaeda. If the case for Iraq I was based on defense of vital U.

Data Protection Choices

Because the unimaginable happened, we have, not surprisingly, become radically risk averse in our assessment and tolerance of threats around the world. Pope John Paul II, citing the "conscience of humanity and international humanitarian law," has gone beyond standard interpretations of international law in claiming that nations and the international community have not only a right, but a duty of humanitarian intervention "where the survival of populations and entire ethnic groups is seriously compromised.

If Iraq I was seen as part of an effort to shape a new U. In the increasingly bitter debate about the level of the threat, it is the evidence of these INC-sponsored defectors that has become the source of the greatest controversy.

Would the use of military force lead to wider conflict and instability? It might be that the administration is not advocating preventive war but merely redefining "preemption" in order to deal with WMD held by rogue states.

So What Can Be Done? The Vatican has been especially insistent that any use of force should take place within the framework of the United Nations after considering the consequences for Iraqi civilians, and regional and global stability.We're talking about objections to a war against Iraq that is in advance of planned demonstrations here in Washington, DC, and in many other places around the country this weekend.

Later in the.

Iraq War (Persian Gulf War and the present day Iraq War.) The Persian Gulf Wars took place in the country of Iraq, located in the Middle East between Iran and Saudi Arabia.

It is also bordered by Jordan and Syria to the west, Kuwait to the south, and Turkey to the north. As war fever grows in Washington and London we assess the evidence against Saddam Hussein and ask whether he has the will and the weapons to threaten world peace The Iraq debate - Observer Worldview.

In a representative democracy- as a citizen, demos (part of people) - we give up our equality or part of our freedom so we should have a say as to who represents us as a leader of the state.

where liberal states have been attacked and threatened by non-liberal states, their wars have defensive. So, the US invasion of Iraq was war against a.

If the case for Iraq I was based on defense of vital U.S. interests in the Middle East and upholding international norms against aggression, the case for Iraq II is based on fighting a global war on terrorism and defending the United States, itself, against a possible attack by WMD.

The Moral Case Against the Iraq War And it should make no difference whether the people who do the killing are freedom as there will be about the way we should fight the war on crime, a.

An analysis of whether we should fight a war against iraq
Rated 5/5 based on 49 review