After coal, the world turned to petroleum and deposits of petroleum continue to reduce thereby unable to provide for the growing needs of humankind.
There is a rather large list of potential alternative energy sources that could prove to be healthier and safer options to nuclear power. Nuclear power will lead to nuclear proliferation[ edit ] Nuclear reactors produce a small amount of plutonium during their operation.
The small amounts of radioactivity that, unfortunately, leaked out of the housing building caused a disaster of proportional capacities. The debate as to whether use and supply of nuclear energy is safe has been going on for a long time. It sets up three tiers of insurance. Deposits of wastes from nuclear energy are easily located in geological sites that serve as storage.
Liability limitation laws give the nuclear industry an unfair advantage[ edit ] Many countries have laws that limit the liability of nuclear operators in case of an accident, including Britain, Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden and the U. Today, energy controls the international system, and supply of this energy is currently from fossil fuel.
The Earth has the high reserves of uranium. What are the Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy? Its abandonment cost is also very high. The usual background dose is 3 mSv per year, but there are considerable variations. However, plutonium is also the material used in most nuclear bombs.
This substance is highly radioactive and, if not disposed of properly, can leak into the environment, which subsequently can cause irreparable damage to the environment and people coming into contact with it. Where reduction of other sources of energy has occurred, nuclear energy is limitless.
Despite the long lull in nuclear construction there are several suppliers for the heaviest components: Even with no nuclear power, people would be exposed to small doses of radiation. Conclusion Today, nuclear energy remains controversial. The world is at a stage where another energy alternative is necessary to continue extensive civilization just like coal took over from wood, and petroleum from whale oil Morgan A nuclear power plant works a lot like a coal plant, but instead of burning coal and producing numerous by-product gases, the energy in a power plant is explicitly from fission.
Renewable sources are cheap and clean to harness and supply. The spent fuel is highly radioactive and has to be carefully stored for many years after use. In years past, nuclear power was a feasible solution to the problem. However, this has never been achieved in practice, and it would be a challenge even for existing nuclear powers.
Renewable sources are usable in local productions that require low concentrations of applications while nuclear energy is for use in high-energy requirement areas.
It would be absurd for a proliferate state to spend its resources on a very dubious route of obtaining nuclear weapons, when there are more affordable ways that are known to work.
By saying that nuclear energy is clean, what this primarily means is that there is no emission of harmful gases like sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and carbon dioxide. In other countries, the there is reprocessing of spent fuel to single out potential elements that are radioactive Lillington Dumping of radioactive waste into the nearby river from to caused several breakouts of radiation sickness in villages downstream.
Normally operating nuclear power plants emit small amounts of radioactive gases arising from the fission of fuel into the atmosphere. A solution to the waste management problem needs to be explored and developed.
Lerner Publications Co, Fuel is inexpensive and a plant can be operated by small number of people, approximately 10 people. There is a supply bottleneck for pressure vessels[ edit ] One of the more advanced arguments is that pressure vessels for modern nuclear reactors are very large and can only be forged by only a few manufacturers.
This waste is essentially an isotope of the Uranium Oxide fuel, or UO2, that nuclear reactors are powered by. For example, hydro dams in the U. The technology has since become developed from the days of Hiroshima and Chernobyl. Clean Energy Nuclear energy has the ability to produce electricity without greenhouse gas emissions.Essay:Arguments against nuclear power.
This essay is an original work by RationalWiki users. (see the page history for a list of the contributors) It does not necessarily reflect the views expressed in RationalWiki's Mission Statement, The main flaw in this argument is that there are different kinds of plutonium.
Free Essay: Every Friday in Japan, the lawn of the office of the Prime Minister fills up with hundreds of Japanese citizens to protest in concern about the.
Arguments for Nuclear power. The main argument for the use of nuclear power is that using nuclear power does not contribute to global warming.
Burning fossil. Nuclear power plants operate reliably and have a continuous output of killarney10mile.com plants do not generally face operations and maintenance problems.
This is a contrast to other alternative energies which depend on the activity of the weather. (This can therefore be seen as an argument against banning nuclear power plants as there is the burning of fossil fuels that is taking place which are producing greater amounts of pollution than what nuclear power stations are giving off.).
My Argumentative essay was about nuclear power. This topic was interesting to me, because one of the major projects back in UAE is nuclear power.Download