Some may argue that there is not enough concrete evidence to use deterrence as an argument for the death penalty. This is not due to discrimination; this is due to the higher rate at which these groups commit crime ProCon. All states that use the death penalty use lethal injection; the days of subjecting a prisoner to hanging or the electric chair are long gone in the US.
When someone commits a crime it disturbs the order of society; these crimes take Death penalty murderers essay lives, peace, and liberties from society.
We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender. The death penalty can be an extremely useful tool in sentencing criminals that have committed some of the worst crimes known to society.
The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. While statistics appear to strengthen the argument in favor of death penalty, they are just numbers that do not support actual crime rates.
However, the strongest arguments are those that criticized the studies for their faulty methodologies, insufficient data and flawed assumptions Liptak, In the case of Furman v.
Whether or not others deserved the same punishment, whatever the economic or racial group, have avoided execution is irrelevant.
It is surprising how politicians continue to support death penalty instead of looking into more effective and reliable alternatives. On the other side of the coin are those who view the punishment as unconstitutional, barbaric, and just plain cruel. A New Debate [Online] http: Based on their two controversial studies, they conclude that for each execution, five murders are prevented.
He highlights that it is the most feared form of punishment and because of its finality, it could deter prospective murderers who are not deterred by long-term imprisonment. Critics add that the findings are skewed by data from a few jurisdictions, largely from Texas, hence, it is not representative of national data Liptak, The Case for Justice.
It is imperative that we begin to pass legislation making capital punishment legal throughout the United States so that justice can be served properly. The death penalty is an asset to society; it deters potential criminals as well as serves retribution to criminals, and is in no way immoral.
There are many reasons as to why I believe the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, retribution, and morality; and because opposing arguments do not hold up, I will refute the ideas that the death penalty is unconstitutional, irrevocable mistakes are made, and that there is a disproportionality of race and income level.
It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. The ambiguous results of studies make the deterrence argument weak. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss.
The largest percentage of readers are between the ages of 35 and 44, and the majority of readers have either a college degree or a graduate degree. It removes the burden from taxpayers. Death Penalty Persuasive Essay This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done.In the article “Death penalty is a deterrence”, the authors claims that by practicing the death penalty, violent crimes will decrease. “violent crime has declined 11 percent, with murder showing the largest decline at even more than 22 percent.
Pro-Death Penalty Essay example Words | 5 Pages. a total of 3, inmates currently on death row. These people include all of the main races in America.
In Robert Massie murdered a mother of two in California during a robbery. Mere hours before he was scheduled to be executed. This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the. Against the Reintroduction of the Death Penalty for Murder The death penalty was abolished in the United Kingdom in (Blackwell ) The abolishment of the death penalty was not a simple case.
Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven.” The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years.
As observed, states in the United States that don't use the death penalty have a lower murder rate that that of the states that do (Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crimes, ).
For example, there was a forty six percent lower rate of murder in non death penalty states than in death penalty states ("Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crimes.", ).Download