Due to intensive technological progress during the recent two centuries, humanity has achieved a lot of what has been considered impossible in earlier epochs; flight is one of them. Airport security services screen the insides of electronic devices to see if nothing was changed inside; airport security officers know how the insides of electronic devices should look like, so any discrepancies do not remain unnoticed.
Quantities of liquids allowed on board are limited because it is possible to make a liquid bomb, or use liquids as components for bombs, and electronics are checked for discrepancies within their inner components.
This is truly a problem yet to be solved. These methods are often treated as humiliating and degrading, especially by passengers with increased modesty, vulnerability, or sensitivity, and may result in the alienation of people and making them feel distrust towards governments, whose duty is to protect them.
In fact, liquids can pose a great threat to aviation, because they can be used as ingredients for bombs; inthe liquid bomb plot was revealed.
However, the more reasonable claim against WBI scanners deals with potential health issues; since WBIs emit ionizing radiation, they may be dangerous for people who use airplanes often. These security measures have caused massive protests from civil rights organizations and citizens, who assessed them as a serious privacy violation of passengers—a rude intrusion of their personal space.
Today, if you have enough money to afford an airplane ticket, you can travel far distances in almost no time. And, unfortunately, the complete refusal from inspecting passengers and letting them board on planes like on railway trains—as it had happened in the s Annenberg Classroom —is impossible today.
Besides, these images cannot be stored, faces are blurred, and the scanner operator never knows neither the identity nor face of any passenger that has been scanned The Hill. Council on Foreign Relations, 28 Dec. The reason for this is that bins are usually cluttered with the articles passengers take out of their bags, or take off themselves, so scanners allow faster, more thorough, and stress-free checking for airport staff Transportation Security Administration.
For example, specially trained dogs can smell explosives or armory lubrication, but it is doubtful passengers would like to be examined by such dangerous beasts. Unfortunately, it is often conjugated with privacy violation and other similar issues.
Another strange requirement is the limited quantity of liquid a passenger can take on board. Mechanical and sometimes manual inspection seems to be the most effective way of revealing hidden threats, especially compared to the majority of other existing methods. Inthe TSA had implemented full-body x-ray scanning, which was meant to guarantee that no suspicious or threatening items transported by would-be terrorists could be carried on board Council on Foreign Relations.
And since one of the most serious threats for air flights, in particular today is terrorism, airports do their best to prevent all possible dangers on the ground.
Before, bins were used to check if there were something hidden inside a shoe, but today, scanners are being used more and more often.
The reason for this is that would-be terrorists can tamper with the insides of a laptop or a cellphone to turn it into a device that could cause damage for example, a detonator. Though airplane flights are considered to be among the safest ways of traveling, they are usually connected to a number of risks aggravated by the vulnerability of the aircraft and its passengers.
Because of this, airline companies implement strict security rules and checks, and force passengers to submit to them, thus causing frustration and discontent; sometimes these checks may seem excessive and even humiliating, even though they are mandatory.
An online search for WBI scanner sample images provides a vast amount of non-colored pictures, from which one can only understand whether a passenger was male or female, and whether they were carrying prohibited items with them.
Therefore, measures that are often considered excessive or humiliating are necessary for preventing terror acts or violence on board. Security measures in airports—even the weirdest—have a strong rationale behind them.
However, is there any other reasonable alternative for preventing assaults on planes? For example, the requirement to take off shoes and placing them in an X-Ray scanner is connected to the detection of hidden items, and for a more thorough and fast check.
If something seems suspicious, officers take necessary measures to prevent possible acts of terrorism Transportation Security Agency. Terrorists planned to create bombs that would look like liquids water, sodaplaced in regular plastic bottles BBC News.
Having to take electronics, such as laptops, cameras, and so on out of your luggage is also necessary. An ultimate and final liquidation of world terrorism does not seem possible, therefore certain people will continue to be willing to cause moral and physical damage to other countries, be it the U.
Although statistically being the safest type of public transport, airplanes are vulnerable to the threat of terrorism.
Since the threat of global terrorism does not seem like it is going to fade away in the nearest future, there is no real alternative to security measures that exist currently; therefore, people and civic rights organizations, protesting against the use of these methods should either consider the risks of not checking all the people boarding on a plane, or come up with innovative security methods and procedures that would not infringe on human rights.
One of the security measures that often causes misunderstanding and questions is having to take off shoes and to place them on an X-Ray belt. As it can be seen, liquids are not all that innocent, and this is why passengers can take only limited quantities of them.
Sincenumerous research studies and explosives testing were conducted in order to determine what liquid quantities are safe to bring aboard an aircraft Transportation Security Administration.The Debate Over Airport Security Essay Words | 5 Pages. Airport security Does the thought of going through airport security make you want to jump off a bridge?
Some people may think that security in airports is either too strict, or it is not enforced enough. Airport security has certainly developed over time, both in terms of more technology.
Sep 11, · Airport Security. Whereas the TSA is responsible for prescreening and screening airline passengers, airport operators, with the assistance of state and local law enforcement, are responsible for the physical security of airport property including perimeter security and surveillance measures, access controls, and law enforcement.
A custom written essay example on the topic of airport security. See how hard it is to protect aircraft, crew and passengers from terrorist attacks. Airport Security and Challenges. A number of terrorist attacks have occurred all over the world, targeting airports and aircraft that have led one to ponder upon the security at Airports.
The Controversy Over New Airport Security Measures Essay Words | 9 Pages The country’s recently heightened airport security measures have become a source of controversy and debate across the Nation. Essays in the Category “Airline Travel” These essays are part of a debate with Kip Hawley, the former Administrator of the TSA.
For the full debate, see The Economist's website. German translation. Airport security found a jar of pasta sauce in my luggage last month.
It was a 6-ounce jar, above the limit; the official confiscated it. Essay on Aviation Security for Mid-Sized Airports. Airport Grounds It is best to have fencing around the boarder of the airport’s property. Security fencing is the most common means of securing airports perimeters.
The height of the fence can vary depending on the airport’s security needs.Download